Part 7 of 7 · Jev in trading, tested
QuantDinger Jev Filter Backtest: 0 of 1,324
With QuantDinger's defaults, the Jev gate decided 0 of 1,324 entries and let every trade through. With the thresholds removed, it did no better than a coin flip.
Experiments with trading technology and AI, measured against simple baselines.
Showing posts tagged #quantdinger. Clear
Part 7 of 7 · Jev in trading, tested
With QuantDinger's defaults, the Jev gate decided 0 of 1,324 entries and let every trade through. With the thresholds removed, it did no better than a coin flip.
Part 6 of 7 · Jev in trading, tested
Jev misread Bitcoin's indicators in my test (AUC 0.486 vs 0.522 for a plain model). Where Jev does help traders, and a 5-question checklist for AI claims.
Part 4 of 7 · Jev in trading, tested
QuantDinger lets Jev block entry orders. The rules are sensible, but it lets trades through when unsure or out of credits, and you can't backtest it.
Part 3 of 7 · Jev in trading, tested
QuantDinger's bots stack three exits: per trade, per basket, per bot equity. Worth copying into an EA. Its martingale needs 20-250 wins to repay one loss.
Part 2 of 7 · Jev in trading, tested
I read QuantDinger's code. Order handling and backtest look-ahead are done well; account risk limits aren't wired into live trading. Details inside.